The project of E Pluribus Unum is twofold. Its first and underlying concern is the general philosophic problem of the one and the many as it came to be understood at the time. W. C. Harris supplies a detailed account of the genealogy of the concept, exploring both its applications and its paradoxes as a basis for state and identity formation.
Harris then considers the perilous integration of the one and the many as a motive in the major literary accomplishments of 19th-century U.S. writers. Drawing upon critical as well as historical resources and upon contexts as diverse as cosmology, epistemology, poetics, politics, and Bible translation, he discusses attempts by Poe, Whitman, Melville, and William James to resolve the problems of social construction caused by the paradox of e pluribus unum by writing literary and philosophical texts that supplement the nation’s political founding documents.
Poe (Eureka), Whitman (Leaves of Grass), Melville (Billy Budd), and William James (The Varieties of Religious Experience) provide their own distinct, sometimes contradictory resolutions to the conflicting demands of diversity and unity, equality and hierarchy. Each of these texts understands literary and philosophical writing as having the potential to transform-conceptually or actually-the construction of social order.
This work will be of great interest to literary and constitutional scholars.
“W. C. Harris's E Pluribus Unum identifies a vital intersection between American constitutional law and American religious and imaginative literature. Harris correctly discerns that the American legislative problem and the millennial enigma of ‘representation as such’ are the same. As a result, he is able to throw important new light on the meaning both of American poetic originality (Poe, Whitman, Melville) and of the originality and challenge of the American social order.”—Allen Grossman, Mellon Professor of English, Johns Hopkins University
“As he analyzes the nation’s foundational performative, e pluribus unum, W. C. Harris asserts that early American authors fashioned texts informed by and meant to respond to the fundamental contradiction between the constitutional imperative to unity and the representational inevitability of differentiation. Harris addresses literary theorists, political scientists, and scholars of American studies with an argument that is nuanced, eloquent, and theoretically informed.”—Donald E. Pease, Jr., Avalon Foundation Chair of the Humanities, Dartmouth College
“Out of many, one.” But how do the many become one without sacrificing difference or autonomy? This problem was critical to both identity formation and state formation in late 18th- and 19th-century America. The premise of this book is that American writers of the time came to view the resolution of this central philosophical problem as no longer the exclusive province of legislative or judicial documents but capable of being addressed by literary texts as well.